- Awards Season
- Big Stories
- Pop Culture
- Video Games
Enhance Critical Thinking Skills through Daily Engagement with Puzzles
In today’s fast-paced world, where information is readily available at our fingertips, it’s crucial to develop and enhance critical thinking skills. One effective way to achieve this is by engaging in daily puzzles. Whether it’s a crossword, Sudoku, or a brain teaser, puzzles of the day can provide a fun and challenging exercise for your mind. In this article, we will explore the benefits of daily puzzle engagement and how it can sharpen your critical thinking skills.
Mental Stimulation and Problem-Solving Abilities
Engaging in puzzles on a regular basis provides mental stimulation that keeps your brain active and alert. When you tackle puzzles of the day, you are presented with various problems that require logical reasoning and problem-solving abilities. These challenges push you to think creatively and find innovative solutions.
By consistently engaging in puzzle solving, you train your brain to approach problems from different angles, improving your ability to think critically. This skillset extends beyond puzzle-solving scenarios and becomes applicable in various real-life situations such as decision-making processes or analyzing complex issues.
Memory Retention and Cognitive Function
Puzzles not only stimulate critical thinking but also help improve memory retention and cognitive function. When solving puzzles of the day, you are required to remember patterns, rules, or clues provided within the puzzle itself.
This constant exercise of memory retrieval strengthens neural connections in the brain responsible for storing information. As a result, you will notice an improvement in your ability to recall information quickly and accurately.
Moreover, engaging in regular puzzle-solving activities has been linked to enhanced cognitive function. It has been shown that individuals who regularly engage in puzzles perform better on tasks related to memory, processing speed, and attention span compared to those who do not engage in such activities.
Increased Concentration and Focus
In today’s digital age where distractions are abundant, maintaining concentration and focus has become a challenge for many. Engaging in puzzles of the day can help combat this problem.
When solving a puzzle, you need to concentrate on the task at hand, blocking out any distractions. This focused attention allows you to delve deep into the problem and analyze it thoroughly. Over time, regular engagement with puzzles improves your ability to concentrate for longer periods and enhances your overall focus.
Stress Reduction and Mental Well-being
Puzzles provide a wonderful escape from the daily stressors of life. When you immerse yourself in solving puzzles, you enter a state of flow where time seems to fly by, and your mind is fully engaged in the task.
This state of flow promotes relaxation and reduces stress levels. As you solve each piece of the puzzle, you experience a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction, boosting your mood and mental well-being.
Additionally, engaging in puzzles can serve as a form of meditation or mindfulness practice. It allows you to disconnect from technology and be present in the moment, focusing solely on the task at hand.
In conclusion, incorporating daily puzzles into your routine can have numerous benefits for enhancing critical thinking skills. From mental stimulation to improved memory retention, increased concentration to stress reduction – puzzles provide a holistic approach to sharpening your cognitive abilities while having fun along the way. So why not make “puzzle of the day” part of your daily routine? Start challenging yourself today.
This text was generated using a large language model, and select text has been reviewed and moderated for purposes such as readability.
MORE FROM ASK.COM
clock This article was published more than 11 years ago
Texas GOP rejects ‘critical thinking’ skills. Really.
(Update: Stephen Colbert’s take; other details)
In the you-can't-make-up-this-stuff department, here's what the Republican Party of Texas wrote into its 2012 platform as part of the section on education:
Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.
Yes, you read that right. The party opposes the teaching of “higher order thinking skills” because it believes the purpose is to challenge a student’s “fixed beliefs” and undermine “parental authority.”
It opposes, among other things, early childhood education, sex education, and multicultural education, but supports “school subjects with emphasis on the Judeo-Christian principles upon which America was founded.”
When taken with the other parts of the education platform(see below), it seems a fair conclusion that the GOP Party in Texas doesn’t think much of public education. Unfortunately, this notion isn’t limited to the GOP in Texas but is more commonly being seen across the country by some of the most strident of “school reformers.”
It should be noted that after the plank in the platform was ridiculed, Texas GOP Communications Director Chris Elam told TPM.com that it was all a big mistake and that opposition to "critical thinking" wasn't supposed to be included. It can't be easily removed, he said, because the platform had been approved by a party convention and any changes would also have to go through the same process. That clears things up.
You can see Stephen Colbert's hilarious take on this episode by clicking here .
It also seems worth noting that there is some question as to whether critical thinking can actually be taught. University of Virginia cognitive scientist Daniel Willingham argues that it cannot be taught in this 2007 article.
First Willingham defines critical thinking this way: Critical thinking consists of seeing both sides of an issue, being open to new evidence that disconfirms your ideas, reasoning dispassionately, demanding that claims be backed by evidence, deducing and inferring conclusions from available facts, solving problems, and so forth. Then too, there are specific types of critical thinking that are characteristic of different subject matter: That's what we mean when we refer to "thinking like a scientist" or "thinking like a historian."
Later in the article he writes: After more than 20 years of lamentation, exhortation, and little improvement, maybe it's time to ask a fundamental question: Can critical thinking actually be taught? Decades of cognitive research point to a disappointing answer: not really. People who have sought to teach critical thinking have assumed that it is a skill, like riding a bicycle, and that, like other skills, once you learn it, you can apply it in any situation. Research from cognitive science shows that thinking is not that sort of skill.
But of course, that isn’t what the Texas GOP is arguing. It sees “critical thinking” as something subversive. Scary stuff.
Here’s the rest of the education section of the Texas GOP’s 2012 platform:
American Identity Patriotism and Loyalty – We believe the current teaching of a multicultural curriculum is divisive. We favor strengthening our common American identity and loyalty instead of political correctness that nurtures alienation among racial and ethnic groups. Students should pledge allegiance to the American and Texas flags daily to instill patriotism.
Basic Standards – We favor improving the quality of education for all students, including those with special needs. We support a return to the traditional basics of reading, writing, arithmetic, and citizenship with sufficient discipline to ensure learning and quality educational assessment.
Bilingual Education – We encourage non-English speaking students to transition to English within three years.
Career and Technology Education (Vocational Education) – We support reinstatement of voluntary career and technology education, including adjusting the 4x4 requirements as needed, without detracting from non-vocational program requirements.
Classroom Discipline –We recommend that local school boards and classroom teachers be given more authority to deal with disciplinary problems. Corporal punishment is effective and legal in Texas.
Classroom Expenditures for Staff – We support having 80% of school district payroll expenses of professional staff of a school district be full-time classroom teachers.
College Tuition – We recommend three levels of college tuition: In-state requiring proof of Texas legal citizenship, out-of-state requiring proof of US citizenship, and nonresident legal alien. Non-US citizens should not be eligible for state or federal grants, or loans.
Controversial Theories – We support objective teaching and equal treatment of all sides of scientific theories. We believe theories such as life origins and environmental change should be taught as challengeable scientific theories subject to change as new data is produced. Teachers and students should be able to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these theories openly and without fear of retribution or discrimination of any kind.
Early Childhood Development – We believe that parents are best suited to train their children in their early development and oppose mandatory pre-school and Kindergarten. We urge Congress to repeal government-sponsored programs that deal with early childhood development.
Educational Entitlement – We encourage legislation that prohibits enrollment in free public schools of non-citizens unlawfully present in the United States.
Funding of Education – We urge the Legislature to direct expenditures to academics as the first priority.
Higher Education – We support merit-based admissions for all college and university applicants to public institutions. We further support the repeal of the 1997 Texas legislative act commonly known as the Top Ten Percent Rule. All Texas students should be given acceptance priority over out-of-state or foreign students.
Juvenile Daytime Curfew - We strongly oppose Juvenile Daytime Curfews. Additionally, we oppose any official entity from detaining, questioning and/or disciplining our children without the consent of a child’s parent.
Local Control for Education – We support school choice and believe that quality education is best achieved by encouraging parental involvement, protecting parental rights, and maximizing local independent school district control. District superintendents and their employees should be made solely accountable to their locally elected boards. We support sensible consolidation of local school districts. We encourage local ISDs to consider carefully the advantages and disadvantages of accepting federal education money.
No Taxpayer Paid Lobbyists – We support the prohibition of any paid public school employee or contractor to lobby the legislature or the SBOE, unless on an unpaid basis and in an unofficial capacity. No registered lobbyist should be allowed to run for SBOE.
Parental Rights in Education – We believe the right of parents to raise and educate their children is fundamental. Parents have the right to withdraw their child from any specialized program. We urge the Legislature to enact penalties for violation of parental rights.
Sex Education – We recognize parental responsibility and authority regarding sex education. We believe that parents must be given an opportunity to review the material prior to giving their consent. We oppose any sex education other than abstinence until marriage.
Parental School Choice – We encourage the Governor and the Texas Legislature to enact child-centered school funding options which fund the student, not schools or districts, to allow maximum freedom of choice in public, private, or parochial education for all children.
Permanent School Fund – We believe that because the Permanent School Fund is not paid by taxpayers that the principle balance should be safeguarded and not viewed as a source of additional funding for our state budget.
Political Community Organizing in Texas Schools - We believe neither Texas public schools should be used nor their students should be instructed by groups such as SEIU or other community organizers as instruments to promote political agenda during the instructional school day.
Private Education – We believe that parents and legal guardians may choose to educate their children in private schools to include, but not limited to, home schools and parochial schools without government interference, through definition, regulation, accreditation, licensing, or testing.
Religious Freedom in Public Schools – We urge school administrators and officials to inform Texas school students specifically of their First Amendment rights to pray and engage in religious speech, individually or in groups, on school property without government interference. We urge the Legislature to end censorship of discussion of religion in our founding documents and encourage discussing those documents.
School Surveys and Testing – Public schools should be required to obtain written parental consent for student participation in any test or questionnaire that surveys beliefs, feelings, or opinions. Parental rights, including viewing course materials prior to giving consent, should not be infringed.
State Board of Education (SBOE) – We believe that the SBOE should continue to be an elected body consisting of fifteen members. Their responsibilities must include:
— Appointing the Commissioner of Education
— Maintaining constitutional authority over the Permanent School Fund
— Maintaining sole authority over all curricula content and the state adoption of all educational materials. This process must include public hearings.
The SBOE should be minimally staffed out of general revenue.
Textbook Review – Until such time as all texts are required to be approved by the SBOE, each ISD that uses non-SBOE approved instructional materials must verify them as factually and historically correct. Also the ISD board must hold a public hearing on such materials, protect citizen’s right of petition and require compliance with TEC and legislative intent. Local ISD boards must maintain the same standards as the SBOE.
Supporting Military Families in Education – Existing truancy laws conflict with troop deployments. We believe that truancy laws should be amended to allow 5 day absence prior to deployments and R&R. Military dependents by definition will be Texas residents for education purposes.
Traditional Principles in Education – We support school subjects with emphasis on the Judeo-Christian principles upon which America was founded and which form the basis of America’s legal, political and economic systems. We support curricula that are heavily weighted on original founding documents, including the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Founders’ writings.
School Health Care – We urge legislators to prohibit reproductive health care services, including counseling, referrals, and distribution of condoms and contraception through public schools. We support the parents’ right to choose, without penalty, which medications are administered to their minor children. We oppose medical clinics on school property except higher education and health care for students without parental consent.
U.S. Department of Education – Since education is not an enumerated power of the federal government, we believe the Department of Education (DOE) should be abolished.
Zero Tolerance – We believe that zero tolerance policies in schools should specify those items that will not be tolerated at schools. The policy should be posted on ISD websites.
Transparency – We support legislation requiring all school districts to post their expenditures online or made readily available to the public.
Foreign Culture Charter Schools in Texas – We oppose public funding of charter schools which receive money from foreign entities. We demand that these Charter Schools have accountability and transparency to local parents, taxpayers, the State of Texas, as do current public schools, including U.S. citizenship of public school trustees.
Follow The Answer Sheet every day by bookmarking www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet.
The Texas Center for Educational Technology
- UNT Directory
- Jobs at UNT
- Members & Faculty
- Partners & Collaborators
- Bring the NOW of Science to the Museum!
- Cognitive Offloading
- Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics
- AR/VR/MR for Education and Training
- Multimedia Design
- STEM Learning and Computational Thinking
- Virtual Reality and Social Presence
- Getting Started
- Kindergarten Reading & Writing
- Kindergarten Math
- Kindergarten Social Studies
- Reading & Writing
- Social Studies
- Learning Schedules
- K-12 Readiness Evaluation Surveys
- Social Media
- Members and Collaborators
- Research and Projects
- Deeply Digital Curricula
You are here
Critical thinking projects and applications aim at designing and developing educational products and learning environments to promote higher order thinking skills. A collaborative project between UNT Learning Technologies faculty Dr. Spector and NetDragon, a corporation based in Fuzhou, China, involves critical thinking applications for school children (ages 8 to 13) to help them develop strong habits of mind and reasoning skills relevant to principled and sustained inquiry and critical thinking. Critical thinking skills that range from noticing and explaining unusual things, evaluating alternative explanations, and reflecting on problem solving processes are necessary for learners who will emerge into a 21st century professional world. The collaboration was initially funded by NetDragon through the NetDragon Digital Research Centre at UNT and was later funded through the Texas Center for Educational Technology started in early 2020 with a focus on the development and research of a Critical Thinking Learning Package. There are several innovative aspects with regard to this project, including:
• Embracing a developmental approach that is based on the notion that inquiry and critical thinking skills are complex and are developed through sustained effort over time;
• Initiating a developmental approach with young learners and a game-based context that is intended to be engaging and encourage sustained participation through a series of levels;
• Planning developmental sequences that are consistent with prior research and that proceed from (a) encouraging inquiry so as to develop an inquiring habit of mind; (b) encouraging exploration so as to develop the notion that having a question implies not knowing, involves committing time and effort to reach resolution, requires evidence and evaluation of evidence, and often requires identifying and questioning assumptions;
• Establishing critical thinking as multi-faceted, involving argumentation, creativity, and decision making, often in the context of solving problems and puzzling situations;
• Framing critical thinking skills as socially situated and dialogical, which means that language and others are important in the development of these skills; as a result, a game environment with phases and levels that can serve as a learning companion is proposed.
The following are applications (download links available) that have been developed in this project to cultivate critical thinking skills in school children. The technologies currently adopted include mobile applications and VR games.
1.Game of India (Coin game) Game of India is the title of an article published in 1978 which inspired the creation of this VR game, “Game of India”. The VR game provided a scenario in which a group of people are playing the coin game, learners practice their thinking skills by adopting an observer role during the process of completing their tasks. Demo Download: Game of India (VR game, video demo)
Figure 1. Game of India (VR game)
2. 3D Virtual Learning Space 3D Virtual Learning Space is designed for provide a virtual learning environment in which students explore and be guided by a virtual tutor. The learning space allows learners to learn different topics such as dinosaur and fossil. Demo Download: 3D Virtual Learning Space
Figure 2. 3D Virtual Learning Space
3. Educational Audio e-book on Coronavirus The e-book provides situational conversations in which coronavirus knowledge is supposed to be acquired after students read through the e-book. The e-book provides audio for those who prefer listening or multiple channel learning style rather than reading only. E-book download: Coronavirus: Diseases and Personal Habits
Figure 3. 3D Educational Audio E-Book on Coronavirus Knowledge
Publications related to the critical thinking collaborative project:
• Spector, J. M. (2018, July). Thinking and learning in the Anthropocene: The new three Rs. Presented at the2018 International Big History Conference, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, 26-29 July 2019.
• Ma, S., Bhagat, K., Spector, J., Lin, L., Liu, D., Leng, J., Tiruneh, D., Mancini, J. (2020) Developing Critical Thinking: A Review of Past Efforts as a Framework for a New Approach for Childhood Learning. In: M. Spector, B. Lockee, M. Childress (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_161-1.
• Spector, J. M. (2020). Fostering inquiry, critical thinking and reasoning. In J. Visser & M. Visser (Eds.), The lifelong pursuit to build the scientific mind (229-243), Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. • Spector, J. M., Bhagat, K. K., & Ma, S. (2020, July). Defining, developing and measuring critical thinking. Workshop at the 3rd Pan-Pacific Technology-Enhanced Language Learning & Critical Thinking Meeting. Virtual meeting hosted by UNT via Zoom.
Texas GOP: No More Critical Thinking in Schools
- Share article
Teachers, you may want to be sitting down for this one.
The 2012 Texas Republican Party Platform , adopted June 9 at the state convention in Forth Worth, seems to take a stand against, well, the teaching of critical thinking skills. Read it for yourself:
We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student's fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.
As a top commenter on a Reddit thread wrote about the language, “I was absolutely sure this had to be an elaborate fake ... .” It’s not.
We at Teacher think this may be a kind of first. While the push for accountability via standardized testing—which the current Democratic administration has stood behind—has frequently been characterized as potentially undermining instruction in critical thinking, blatant opposition to teaching students to think deeply has not often (ever?) been a part of the policy conversation.
In that same section of the document, labeled “Educating Our Children,” the Texas Republicans go on to state that they “oppose mandatory pre-school and Kindergarten.” And, in a statement that human rights groups (and many others) will find difficult to stomach, the platform says, “We recommend that local school boards and classroom teachers be given more authority to deal with disciplinary problems. Corporal punishment is effective and legal in Texas.”
While corporal punishment is in fact legal in Texas—and 18 other states, according to The Center for Effective Discipline —we’re still poking around to find the research backing its effectiveness in the Lone Star State. Nothing so far. Readers, let us know what you come across.
(HT: Huffington Post .)
UPDATE: A spokesman for the Republican Party of Texas said that the “critical thinking skills” language should not have been included in the document after the words “values clarification,” reports Talking Points Memo . The members of the subcommittee “regret” the mistake, he told TPM—however, since the platform was approved, “it cannot be corrected until the next state convention in 2014.”
A version of this news article first appeared in the Teaching Now blog.
Sign Up for EdWeek Update
- Upcoming Events
- News & Views
- Schedule a Consultation
- Creating an Effective Syllabus
- Make the First Day Count
- Effective Class Discussions
- Managing the Learning Environment
- Engaging ALL Students
- Student Success
- Delivering an Effective Lecture
- Teaching Large Classes
- Flipped Classroom
- Cooperative Learning
- Group Projects
- Experiential Learning
- Promoting Higher Order Thinking
- Authentic Assessments
- Summative vs. Formative Assessment
- Grading and Ungrading
- Effective Feedback
- Academic Integrity
- Texas Core Curriculum – Communication
- Texas Core Curriculum – Teamwork
- Texas Core Curriculum – Personal Responsibility
- Texas Core Curriculum – Social Responsibility
- Texas Core Curriculum – Critical Thinking
- Texas Core Curriculum – Empirical and Quantitative Skills
- Teaching and Learning with ChatGPT
- RowdyFlex Toolkits
- Teaching Online
- System Alerts
- Creating Effective PowerPoint Slides
- Adobe Creative Cloud
- Provost Academy
- Faculty Learning Communities
- Submit a Tip
- Quick Course Diagnosis
- Classroom Observation
- Department Workshops
- First Year Program
- Faculty Resources
- Affinity Groups
- Create Your Teaching Philosophy
- Build Your Teaching Portfolio
- Schedule a Peer Observation
- Work-Life Balance
- Professional Development – Incentive Opportunities
- Adopt a Free Textbook Faculty Grants
Home / Texas Core Curriculum – Critical Thinking
Texas Core Curriculum – Critical Thinking
The TCC Objectives include creative thinking, innovation, inquiry, and analysis, evaluation and synthesis of information.
Developing Critical Thinking Skills Tutorials (developed by Joe Lau & Johnathan Chan)
Comments are closed
- Manage Account
- Bleeding Out
- Things to Do
- Public Notices
- Help Center
Is Texas discouraging critical thinking in classrooms?
Asking questions matters to understand history.
By David Newman
1:30 AM on Dec 5, 2022 CST
It may seem that the furor over teaching controversial material has died down but, as the Dallas Morning News reported, Gov. Greg Abbott discussed the issue in forceful terms just at the end of November: “ Our schools are for education, not indoctrination . We will put a stop to this nonsense in the upcoming legislative session. Schools must get back to fundamentals and stop pushing ‘woke’ agendas.”
Abbott was directly referring to class discussions of gender identity, but I know that public school teachers are still acutely aware that they are at risk in their classrooms if they broach any controversy having to do with an America that does not always realize its ideals. One of the ideals we insist teachers and students practice is the inculcation of critical thinking. But does the state really want any such thought?
Critical thinking involves asking hard questions: How and why do things happen, how and why do people say the things they say, and how and why should people speak in order to change the things that need changing?
Those who do not ask such questions before participating in civic discourse, before offering a lesson in a public school or before writing new laws about education, are blind to the larger contexts that shape history, that shape opinions; moreover, they want to pass such blindness on to the next generation, and the next, and so on.
Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.
All people concerned about what is taught in public schools should think carefully about how new ideas should be presented to students. But do we really want to require teachers to eschew thoughtfulness in order to capitulate to vague, imperious rules?
In rhetoric classes, we read and discuss issues that cause the greatest furor in the moment, that have a local connection, and that have sides clearly in opposition; in other words, we discuss issues like whether critical race theory should be banned in Texas.
Since those opposed to critical race theory argue that it indoctrinates students, it is then necessary to study some of the best arguments about confronting controversial speech. We read John Milton, John Stuart Mill, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison on the subject.
But shall I also teach “Undemocratic Democracy” by Jamelle Bouie — a provocative essay that challenges the idea that all people living in the U.S. have always been equally protected by foundational ideals regulating, among other things, who has been allowed to speak freely and who has not?
These authors seem entirely relevant in shaping a discussion of the larger contexts in the debate about whether CRT is pernicious indoctrination. One context is described in Milton’s profoundly influential essay “Areopagitica”: Different parts of a building (different ideas) are brought by people who know their own parts well, but who may not understand at all the parts others bring. Yet the difference in parts (in ideas) may have essential value in the completion of a glorious edifice richer exactly because no one has a God’s-eye perspective on the whole construct.
Milton was an early advocate of the idea — radical in 1646 — that censorship prevents inculcating critical thought.
But wait: It now turns out that Bouie’s essay cannot be taught alongside Milton’s; Bouie’s work is part of the “1619 Project”; an essay on whether speech has been free to all in America is now banned in Texas. Has the state not banned teachers’ ability to establish contexts, to make issues relevant?
Should teachers encourage students to participate in intellectual conversations that have great depth and subtlety? Or should we use vague terms like “woke” in order to excise that which challenges students to think about how and why their leaders use particular kinds of rhetorical choices?
How will we help students to manage the depth and subtlety of history and literature if we are unable to ask students to look at as many different ideas as possible, and to ask how they are changed by, or need to formulate more and more elegant rebuttals to, these ideas?
A teacher’s highest calling is to help students think for themselves, so that when they decide what to think, they will choose well, not motivated by hostility to information contrary to their beliefs, and not motivated by political expediency.
Texas will need independent thinkers in the coming years, precisely because some state leaders so deeply distrust where that independence comes from.
David Newman teaches English at Del Mar College in Corpus Christi and lives in Odessa. He wrote this column for The Dallas Morning News.
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here .
Predicting the four college football playoff teams, 5 texas rangers most likely to be discussed in trade talks this offseason, with the mavericks up for sale, a look at mark cuban’s empire beyond basketball, southlake carroll makes statement with 56-7 regional final win over tc byron nelson, texas sent an emphatic college football playoff message. is it enough for the committee, huge 4th quarter powers north crowley in come-from-behind win over allen in regional final, state rep. frederick frazier expected to plead no contest to misdemeanor charges, da says, smu asserts dominance over tulane, secures first conference championship win in 39 years, 5 takeaways from texas vs. oklahoma state: quinn ewers’ historic day in big 12 title win.
- Units and Programs
Make a Gift
- Student Resources
- Faculty Resources
- Teaching Assistants
- Undergraduate Assistants
Jester Center Room A115 201 E 21st St. Austin, Texas 78712 512-471-4421
Essential Element: Critical Thinking
As defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking (1987), critical thinking is “the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action.” At its best, it “transcends subject matter divisions” by being interdisciplinary and multifaceted. In addition, critical thinking is often best prompted by real-life, hands on, experiential learning.
Students entering college are expected to think critically, understand non-linear assignments, and grapple with questions that may not have answers. Too often, however, first-year students have not been taught to think in these ways, and thus struggle to acclimate to their new learning environment. The Signature Courses were designed to address these issues and to turn high school students into successful college scholars.
The first in a series featuring the Signature Course Essential Elements, the following videos highlight Signature Course faculty members discussing how they teach critical thinking in their courses.
Lori Holleran Steiker
- Professional Development
While there are numerous complex definitions of critical thinking, Richard Paul, from the Center for Critical Thinking, and Linda Elder, from the Foundation for Critical Thinking, define it as "the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view to improving it" (2006). Effective critical thinkers question accepted standards, identify problems, and explore alternatives. Essentially, critical thinking is learning what questions to ask and how to ask them, and analyzing previous experience and knowledge to find a better solution. Critical thinking is vital to becoming a productive researcher and scholar, an effective teacher, and a contributing citizen and colleague in whatever career path you choose. Some specific critical thinking skills include: • Analyzing complex problems • Raising vital questions • Gathering and assessing information • Recognizing biases • Thinking open-mindedly and addressing multiple perspectives • Solving problems thoughtfully and fairly
Additional Resources on Critical Thinking • The Foundation for Critical Thinking: https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
• Reed, L. (2018). Building critical thinking skills to solve problems at work. Business.com. https://www.business.com/articles/building-critical-thinking-skills-at-work/
• Wallace, L. (2009). The importance of critical thinking. The Atlantic. May 29. https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2009/05/the-importance-of-critical-thinking/18469/
- Like Graduate School on Facebook Like Graduate School on Facebook
- Follow Graduate School on X (twitter) Follow Graduate School on X (twitter)
- Subscribe to Graduate School on YouTube Subscribe to Graduate School on YouTube
Critical Thinking Questions
Using the definition of the unemployment rate, is an increase in the unemployment rate necessarily a bad thing for a nation?
Is a decrease in the unemployment rate necessarily a good thing for a nation? Explain.
If many workers become discouraged from looking for jobs, explain how the number of jobs could decline but the unemployment rate could fall at the same time.
Would you expect hidden unemployment to be higher, lower, or about the same when the unemployment rate is high, say 10 percent, versus low, say four percent? Explain.
Is the higher unemployment rate for minority workers necessarily an indication of discrimination? Give other potential reasons.
While unemployment is highly correlated with the level of economic activity, it responds with a lag. In other words, firms do not immediately lay off workers in response to a sales decline. They wait a while before responding. Similarly, firms do not immediately hire workers when sales pick up. What do you think accounts for the lag in response time?
Why do you think that unemployment rates are lower for individuals with more education?
Do you think it is rational for workers to prefer sticky wages to wage cuts, when the consequence of sticky wages is unemployment for some workers? Why or why not? How do the reasons for sticky wages explained in this section apply to your argument?
Under what condition would a decrease in unemployment be bad for the economy?
Under what condition would an increase in the unemployment rate be a positive sign?
As the baby boomer generation retires, the ratio of retirees to workers will increase noticeably. How will this affect the Social Security program? How will this affect the standard of living of the average American?
Unemployment rates have been higher in many European countries in recent decades than in the United States. Is the main reason for this long-term difference more likely to be cyclical unemployment or the natural rate of unemployment? Explain briefly.
Is it desirable to pursue a goal of zero unemployment? Why or why not?
Is it desirable to eliminate natural unemployment? Why or why not? Hint —Think about what our economy would look like today and what assumptions would have to be met to have a zero rate of natural unemployment.
The U.S. unemployment rate increased from 4.6 percent in July 2001 to 5.9 percent by June 2002. Without studying the subject in any detail, would you expect that a change of this kind is more likely due to cyclical unemployment or a change in the natural rate of unemployment? Why?
Copy and paste the link code above.